I’m as much a fool for high-wire acts as anyone else. It’s exciting to watch someone expand the boundaries of what’s possible. But when it’s literally a high-wire act?
Last night a “daredevil” (such an old-fashioned word) walked on a tightrope over Niagara Falls in a well-financed stunt, and every news source I’ve looked at this morning, even those you might think would cast a cooler eye, is agog with breathless admiration.
Is anyone else as puzzled as I am by all this hype? I mean, sure, walking on a steel cable is a skill, but aside from a vague appreciation of Nik Wallenda’s sense of balance, I’m left with an empty “So what?”
In fact I’d have ignored the whole thing except that I’m so insulted by the constant use of the word “inspiring.” Not least by the “daredevil” himself. Faced with the standard question from a Canadian customs agent – “What is the purpose of your trip, sir?” – he replied: “To inspire people and the world.”
This is bullshit. If anyone had asked what exactly he was inspiring them to do, he’d probably have continued the stream of clichés with something about fulfilling one’s dreams. In fact he did: “This is what dreams are made of,” he said.
Not my dreams.
Degrading inspiration this way leaves me, appropriately, kind of breathless. Inspiration literally means breathing in. It means inhaling not merely air, but spirit and life. The spirit of life, that is – or the life of the spirit. It implies transcendence, going beyond oneself, reaching for a higher and presumably better level of existence.
Risking your life to save another: that’s inspiring. Refusing to be silenced by fear: inspiring. Expanding your own sense of the possible: inspiring.
But walking 1,800 feet on a steel cable? As any circus pro can tell you, that’s entertainment.
Entirely agree!
You’ve taken the words right out of my mouth. And the mouths of anyone that doesn’t give a shit about people that walk on ropes for a living. Pfft.
At least some people get attention for the good things they do in the world…
Oh wait… They don’t.
I noticed that a lot of different news outlets carried the story, but since I lack TV or radio, I hadn’t paid much attention (and feel no need to now). Think, though, if you were a Wallenda, and what you’d have to do to measure up to a family legacy. In the documentary Man on Wire, I didn’t feel inspired, but I was intrigued by Phillip Petit’s trip between the World Trade Center Towers. Humans seem to acquire strange ambitions for very little reason.
Hear Hear :0)
[…] her post yesterday, I was drawn to this definition of […]
My first Mother-in-Law was a Cuban circus performer as a child, later toured in a dancing team, like Astair/Rogers. She was also in some films. She knew Wallenda’s Grandfather and spoke highly of him to me. I think this kind of behavior is a family thing we can’t understand… Glad he survived! Warmly, Tamam
What I didn’t say was his great-grandfather was in the aerialist family of trapeze artists – Karl (the Great Wallenda) who died during a stunt in 1978… that’s what I meant by “family thing.” T’m
Hi Tamam! I’m glad my father was a doctor…