Blog


About


Books

 Latest Post: Flash!

Agnostic
A Spirited Manifesto
Available April 4, 2016

   Who is the AT?   Books by LH
  • Agnostic

  • The First Muslim

  • After The Prophet

  • Jezebel

  • Mary

  • More from LH

     

Getting High

Posted April 16th, 2014 by Lesley Hazleton

Remember George Lakoff and his wonderful book Metaphors We Live By? He and co-writer Mark Johnson argued that metaphors are not “merely” symbolic;  instead, they shape and determine how we think. That’s why I’ve been playing with the metaphor of height, which appears with remarkable frequency in the increasingly tiresome theist-atheist debate.

sky godThe assumption is that what’s high is good and what’s low is bad. Thus evangelical Christians tend to raise their eyes skyward as they talk about (or to) God or heaven. This is a cultural remnant of the ancient sky god (Baal, Zeus, or Yahweh, depending on where you lived), shown in statuettes wielding a lightning bolt. It also happens to be a clear negation of the assumed monotheistic principle of God as universal and omnipresent, but as Lakoff showed, metaphors trump principle.

We have a long history of altars built on high places, presumably on the basis of “nearer my God to thee,” whatever god or gods were involved. We have steeples and spires, needles and minarets soaring skyward, from the Tower of Babel to Dubai’s Burj al-Khalifa. (And if you happen to live in a valley, or worse, in a canyon, whether concrete or natural, you may find yourself “at the bottom of the heap.”)

The heavenly counterpart is of course hell as the underworld, stoked by fires of molten lava deep beneath the earth’s surface – the hadopelagic, from Hades, the deepest depths. But you don’t have to believe in heaven or hell to be mesmerized by height.

Some evolutionary biologists talk of humans as the “pinnacles” of creation (though I would have thought life as a pinnacle would be an alarmingly lonely business). Others see humans as a “higher order” of evolution (some of them even described as high-functioning).

We have upper and lower classes (both socioeconomic and biological), and upper and lower cases (of course God gets an upper case). We have high and low IQ, high times and low times, high achievement and low, hi-def, hi-fi, hi-res.

Phrases such as “a higher consciousness,” “higher math,” and a “higher power” come tripping off our tongues. As well as “beneath contempt,” and “above reproach.” Our spirits can sink, or soar. We get high, and feel low. And above all, as it were, we occasionally engage in high-level negotiations, rise above our emotions, and give each other a resounding high-five.

None of this would seem to bode well for any consideration in depth, but I intend to keep puzzling at it nonetheless. Maybe I need to climb to a mountaintop…

Share this post:  Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
File under: agnosticism, existence | Tagged: Tags: atheism, George Lakoff, heaven, height, hell, Metaphors We Live By, theism | 22 Comments
  1. Zvi & Dorothy Pantanowitz says:
    April 16, 2014 at 12:46 pm

    This was delicious Lesley.

    And remember ups y-daisy when you fall?

  2. Candace Moore Hill says:
    April 16, 2014 at 1:13 pm

    One wants to start singing “Your love is lifting me higher than I’ve ever been lifted before.”

  3. Charlotte says:
    April 16, 2014 at 1:52 pm

    Lesley, this was just *super* (nudge, wink–get it?).

    The high-low caste system you write about seems so appropriate and natural, I’d never questioned it before. Now I’m wracking my brain to find reversals (low=good/high=bad) and I’m stumped. (Stumps are, of course, both short and bad.)

    This value system is built into the English language, isn’t it, and I wonder what that suggests–the Latin-derived word *positive* means ‘good’ as well as ‘measured increase.’ In every culture I can think of, MORE is better than LESS. (Only the minimalist says “less is more” and it still feels punitive to the majority of us.)

    Are there any examples that challenge this? (All I can think of is “a DEEP sleep” and “IN love,” and “insider” (all positive) vs. “outsider/outcast” (negative).

    Fun!

    • Charlotte says:
      April 16, 2014 at 2:29 pm

      *But the Latin root of ‘positive’ is neutral, meaning only placement or position. Hmmm….

  4. Sohail Kizilbash says:
    April 16, 2014 at 2:46 pm

    Interesting thought process. I wonder how the Chinese think.

  5. georgeann johnson says:
    April 16, 2014 at 7:10 pm

    Ummm Lesley. ” High” and church steeples makes me remember
    the church steeple in Port Gibson, MS. On the very top is a big golden hand with the index finger pointing upwards. Whether that is to outdo other nearby church steeples, or to get you that much closer to capital letter “G”. Or just a kindly reminder that Down means Burning Fires, I am not sure. Metaphors Be With You.
    Georgeann
    PS We met at Rio Caliente about 5 or so years ago.

    • Lesley Hazleton says:
      April 17, 2014 at 9:37 am

      Love that index finger! And like all who were there, I so miss Rio Caliente..

  6. Fatima Haider says:
    April 16, 2014 at 11:07 pm

    Interesting points made. Do you think it may have had something to do with Moses climbing a mountain to talk to God, or Prophet Muhammed meditating in a mountain cave to get divine inspiration?

    • Lesley Hazleton says:
      April 17, 2014 at 10:18 am

      Certainly — the idea of ascension — ascending a mountain, ascending into heaven (Mary, Elijah), flying (Muhammad on the night journey, Elijah in the chariot), and then all those angels with wings…

  7. Nasir Khan says:
    April 17, 2014 at 12:58 am

    Lesle, I am not sure re if you believe in God

  8. fatmakalkan says:
    April 17, 2014 at 5:06 am

    Interesting contemplation! Something’s are imbedded in our genes I believe. This concept is one of them just like fear of dark, white is better than black, yet most importantly very need to find God, and wanting to live eternally . This feelings are not thought by parents or society I believe we are born with them. They are in the blue print of us when we were born.

  9. Niloufer Gupta says:
    April 17, 2014 at 7:21 am

    in india ,the metaphor of height as well as width is in currency – elections 2014, the contending individuals are the young prince ,the broom ,and the size of a chest , May 16 th will determine which metaphor has shaped our poltics for the next five years. The High and the Mighty , might have a Broom to contend with. The three party’s in this fray are the Indian National Congress/ the UPA the symbol is the Hand, the open palm ,the Bharatiya Janata Party/ the BJP ,symbol being the Lotus in bloom,and the Aam Admi Party/ AAP with the Broom as it’s symbol. The High/good is being Challenged by the width of the chest of its male representatives instead of the lotus blooming ,whilst the Low/ short is at the bottom with the Broom ,is considered to be the blue bottle in the dung heap ! It is indeed puzzling and we Indians need to negotiate the maze ,that we are in ,as well. Niloufer Gupta -nilouferg@gmail.com

  10. Jonathan Omer-Man says:
    April 17, 2014 at 6:09 pm

    Stephen Jay Gould, a remarkable evolutionary biologist, suggested that the very slow rate of maturation of human beings, from infancy to adulthood, necessitated that they look up to bigger parents, nurturers, protectors for a extended period, perhaps a quarter of a life span, and this was somehow imprinted and sublimated in religious thought.
    Personally, I find that cathedral architecture, especially high stained glass windows, leads my eyes upwards is often moving and inspiring, with no connection to any theology.

    • Sohail Kizilbash says:
      April 18, 2014 at 12:36 am

      This definitely makes sense.

  11. annie minton says:
    April 17, 2014 at 10:30 pm

    ‘Submergence’ definitely got me thinking about this ‘high’ versus ‘low’

  12. pah says:
    April 19, 2014 at 8:41 am

    hmmm! glad you are back on form…..thinking about this.

  13. Saheem says:
    April 22, 2014 at 1:51 am

    Could it be that taller (read higher) of the human species is stronger and therefore better in terms of biological evolution? And so we as a race have always aspired for taller/higher and not shorter/lower?

    • Lesley Hazleton says:
      April 22, 2014 at 9:46 am

      Hm, I don’t know — surely there are also survival advantages in staying low to the ground? And in being psychically ‘grounded’ — though that word, interestingly, is also a form of teenage punishment.
      (W/r/t this, it took me a long time to get used to the American use of ‘dirt’ for what in the UK we called ‘earth’ or ‘soil.’)

  14. pah says:
    April 24, 2014 at 9:05 am

    hmm….this has really got me thinking…but can;t come up with anything. I mean how do we really know which way is up or down…space is infinite, all around us……

  15. John Hendricks says:
    April 24, 2014 at 1:47 pm

    No, Lesley – find a teacher to show you how to go INSIDE ;
    That will knock ALL concepts !
    John Hendricks.

  16. Omer says:
    May 12, 2014 at 5:46 am

    Leslie,

    Did you know that South was placed up in the first maps such as by Al-Idrisi?

    But then the Europeans made North as being “Up” and South as being “Down” in order to make North appear to be better because of this metaphor of “up” being better.

    • Lesley Hazleton says:
      May 12, 2014 at 9:23 am

      Thanks Omer — I had no idea and will check it out. Fascinating how such things get ‘decided.’

Is Christopher Hitchens Running for Pope?

Posted April 18th, 2010 by Lesley Hazleton

“New atheists” Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins are having a ball with the pedophile priest scandal — it seems to prove everything they’ve ever said about the evils of religion.

It’s disturbing enough that anyone at all is having a ball with this ghastly issue, though maybe that’s inevitable when the Hitchens-Dawkins style of atheism has all the hallmarks of being a religion of its own.  But worse is that their call for the Pope to resign smacks more than a little of… well, to be kind, disingenuousness.  To be less kind, hypocrisy.

If you don’t believe in medicine, you’re hardly going to call for a better doctor.  If H and D really believe all they say about the evils of religion, then there’s no way they could imagine that a change of Pope could make any difference, especially when nobody in the upper reaches of Churchly hierarchy seems capable of plain human feeling — capable, that is, of expressing pure unadulterated outrage that such things have been done under the guise (literally) of priestly robes.

I don’t question H and D’s outrage,  but while most of us are watching this unfold with horror, they can barely contain their glee.

I wish I could feel that glee, but I’m with Nick Kristof on the Op-Ed page of today’s New York Times, talking about “the other Catholic church.”  This is the “grass-roots church” of nuns and priests working with the poor, the sick, and the needy both in the States and worldwide.  “Their magnificence,” writes Kristof, “lies not in their vestments, but in their selflessness.”

Maybe H and D could learn just a bit from that selflessness.   They’ve leapt on the bandwagon of scandal with no apparent purpose other than self-promotion.

Or maybe Hitchens is running for Pope?

Share this post:  Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
File under: agnosticism, atheism, Christianity | Tagged: Tags: atheism, Catholic Church, Christopher Hitchens, Nick Kristof, pedophilia, Pope, Richard Dawkins | 1 Comment
  1. lavrans says:
    April 27, 2010 at 10:19 pm

    Makes me think about the Catholic priests who used to come in and help us at Chicken Soup Brigade. CSB, as an AIDS charity, was filled with a lot of the alternative community. Yet Catholic Community Services used the same space for their meals on wheels, and there was a lot of crossover of help. We would regularly get Catholic groups- from adults to teenagers to nuns-in-training.

    One of my most amusing memories was Valentines day, when someone hired “Leather Santa” to come and people got their pictures taken sitting on his lap. Leather Santa was a very fit young man in leather boots, leather G-string with a whip and a Santa cap. Meanwhile a group of travelling nuns show up to help in the warehouse just as one of the priests was getting his picture taken. There was a certain amount of blushing, but also a lot of laughing.

    I can sympathize with the skepticism of religion, but not the heart of it. It’s too easy to mistake the bureaucracy of religion as its foundation.

Order the Book

Available online from:
  • Amazon.com
  • Barnes & Noble
  • IndieBound
  • Powell's
Or from your favorite bookseller.

Tag Cloud

absurd agnosticism art atheism Christianity ecology existence feminism fundamentalism Islam Judaism light Middle East sanity science technology ugliness US politics war women

Recent Posts

  • Flash! September 1, 2019
  • “What’s Wrong With Dying?” February 9, 2017
  • The Poem That Stopped Me Crying December 30, 2016
  • Talking About Soul at TED December 5, 2016
  • ‘Healing’? No Way. November 10, 2016
  • Psychopath, Defined August 2, 2016
  • Lovely NYT Review of ‘Agnostic’! July 14, 2016
  • Playing With Stillness June 22, 2016
  • Inside Palestine June 20, 2016
  • Virtual Unreality June 6, 2016
  • The Free-Speech Challenge May 23, 2016
  • Category-Free April 20, 2016
  • Staring At The Void April 13, 2016
  • Sherlock And Me April 3, 2016
  • Hard-Wired? Really? March 22, 2016
  • A Quantum Novel March 9, 2016
  • This Pre-Order Thing March 4, 2016
  • The Agnostic Celebration February 29, 2016
  • The First Two Pages February 23, 2016
  • Two Thumbs-Up For “Agnostic” February 10, 2016
Skip to toolbar
  • About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Support Forums
    • Feedback