Blog


About


Books

 Latest Post: Flash!

Agnostic
A Spirited Manifesto
Available April 4, 2016

   Who is the AT?   Books by LH
  • Agnostic

  • The First Muslim

  • After The Prophet

  • Jezebel

  • Mary

  • More from LH

     

The Burqa Strikes Again

Posted December 25th, 2010 by Lesley Hazleton

A stand-up comedian’s take on the Roy Orbison oldie ‘Pretty Woman’ is the latest salvo in the burqa wars.  The video of Saad Haroon performing ‘Burqa Woman’ seems to have gotten a lot of Pakistanis all riled up, both for and against, with everyone reading into it whatever they already believe.

You’d think that with issues like nuclear weapons, the Taliban, and government corruption, Pakistan might have a few other things to worry about right now.  But the burqa is always a reliable way to distract attention and make everyone feel righteous.

The comments on YouTube are way over the top.  That’s nothing new, of course, but it’s disturbing to scroll through and see the preponderance of deep pious offense on the one side (one commenter even calls for Haroon to be stoned to death, for Christ’s sake), and a kind of schoolyard ‘yah-boo-take-that-you-Muslims’ Islamophobia on the other.

In fact if ‘Burqa Woman’ is satire, it seems to me a pretty mild form.  Cheeky would be a better word for it —  the kind of fond teasing a younger brother might deploy against an older sister.  True, if you want to get analytical about it, phrases like “sexy ninja” and “mystery prize” reflect a kind of contemporary Orientalism — the erotics of the mysterious hidden East.  And lines like “show me your left nostril” or “flirting with my living-room curtain” are kind of tasteless (though the veil did begin as a curtain hung in order to give Muhammad’s wives some degree of privacy).  But nobody seems to be getting analytical about this.   All we have so far is a slew of kneejerk responses.

But then what else could there be when the burqa has been so highly politicized?  With new burqa bans in Europe and elsewhere, the burqa has served as a convenient whipping boy (or should that be whipping girl?),  with right-wing politicians manipulating left-wing feminists into joining hands in righteous indignation.

I’ve been a feminist for four decades now, and I know when my feminism is being manipulated.  I’ve no desire to ‘defend the burqa.’  I find it as objectionable as any other form of religious ‘hiding’ of women like Orthodox Jewish women’s wigs or Catholic nuns’ coifs — any religious rule that focuses on women’s sexuality under the guise of ‘protecting them’ from the stereotypically ravenous male eye.  Such rules honor neither women nor men — nor religion itself.

But why single out the burqa?  Why not criticize the Catholic or fundamentalist Christian attitude toward women with the same passion as directed against the Wahhabi or fundamentalist Islamic one?  And why use the burqa issue at all when the vast majority of Muslim women would never dream of putting one on?

I’m looking forward to seeing what the dynamite writers over at altmuslimah have to say about this musical storm in a teacup.  Meanwhile:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkVl_7N-m3I]

Share this post:  Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
File under: feminism, fundamentalism, Islam | Tagged: Tags: burqa, Islamophobia, Pakistan, Saad Haroon, YouTube | 1 Comment
  1. Sunny says:
    February 6, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    “But why single out the burqa?”

    The Burqa is singled out bcause this is the only garment worn in the name of religion that covers the face and impedes a normal human-to-human interaction, say for instance, in an University class room environment.

Why Ban Just the Burqa?

Posted July 14th, 2010 by Lesley Hazleton

Today, Bastille Day, France’s new idea of freedom is banning the burqa.   “Allons enfants de la patrie” — for this you had a revolution?

Yesterday’s vote in the French National Assembly was practically unanimous (one sole nay),  and of course, per the French, has absolutely nothing to do with any kind of anti-Muslim sentiment.    A Dieu ne plaise! It was solely and absolutely for security reasons. So I’m celebrating the French contribution to freedom with a re-run of Let’s Ban Sunglasses.  After all, if the full Islamic veil is now to be  legally defined in France as  a form of criminal concealment, foiling identification by security personnel, why stop there?   Let’s follow the logic and make it easier for everyone to be identified:

Let’s ban sunglasses

and big floppy sunhats

and tinted contact lenses.

Let’s ban wigs

and hair extensions

and make-up.

Let’s ban beards

and clowns’ faces.

Let’s ban cosmetic surgery

and mustaches

and baseball caps

and hair dye

and skin lighteners

and spray-on tans.

Let’s ban and ban and ban

until there’s nothing left to ban any more

and then we’ll be….

safe?

Share this post:  Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
File under: existence, feminism, Islam | Tagged: Tags: ban, Bastille Day, burqa, France, French National Assembly, Marseillaise, niqab, security, veil | 1 Comment
  1. Anosh says:
    May 6, 2012 at 12:57 am

    I couldn’t have said it better myself! 🙂

Why Go Full Tilt at the Full Veil?

Posted April 22nd, 2010 by Lesley Hazleton

Sex and religion are at it again.  French president Nicolas Sarkozy is proposing to ban women from wearing the full Islamic veil because it “hurts the dignity of women and is unacceptable in French society.”

But this is no more about women’s dignity than the invasion of Iraq was about liberating Iraqi women (though the Bush administration didn’t hesitate to use that as one of their many false rationales for war).

Sarkozy’s logic is so badly skewed that it looks like yet another fit of Islamophobia, cynically using women’s rights as the excuse.

Any woman who’s ever tried on a vintage hat with a veil falling from the brim knows the sexy feeling that comes from being half hidden.  But that’s a far lipstick-feminist cry from the full ultra-orthodox Islamic veil — the niqab, which leaves only the eyes uncovered, or the burqa, which has a mesh screen over the eye slit.  These literally make women invisible.  Or in France, it seems, all too visible.

Yet why exactly is such veiling so abhorrent it requires a law to ban it?

Veiling has been used throughout the centuries as a means of keeping women second-class citizens, and not solely in Islam.  It was only narrowly avoided in Christianity — Saint Paul wanted it adopted for all early Christian women.  And women hiding their hair with variants on headscarves is a sign of piety in orthodox Judaism and Christianity (think nuns) as well as in Islam.

Yet the Bible doesn’t call for veiling.   And neither does the Quran.  What it actually says, in Sura 24, verses 30-31, is as follows: “Tell believing men to lower their glances and guard their private parts… And tell believing women to lower their glances and guard their private parts… and let their headscarves fall to cover their necklines.”  Basically, if you’ve got it, don’t flaunt it.

It takes centuries of ultra-conservative clerics to turn a call for bisexual modesty into a sexist straitjacket.

But does that mean a western government should punish women for refusing to conform to social norms?  How is that different from punishing women for refusing to wear the veil in authoritarian Islamic regimes like Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan under the Taliban?

Does this mean France might consider banning other items of women’s clothing?   Ban women from wearing pants, for instance?  Where exactly do “dignity” and “acceptability” start and end, and in whose eyes?  If a woman chooses to cover her face, that’s her decision to make, just as it is if she chooses to bare her midriff.   Either way, government intrusion is objectionable.

Ah, but there’s also a security reason for the proposed new ban, adds Sarkozy’s spokesman.  We need to be able to see people’s faces at airport security checkpoints. But then why not simply require that people uncover their faces for security screening? Why go full tilt at the full veil?

By adopting such legislation, France will only move itself toward a mirror image of Saudi Arabia.  Bare midriffs banned here, full veils banned there.   And women, once again, just pawns in the game.

Share this post:  Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
File under: feminism, Islam | Tagged: Tags: burqa, France, Islam, Islamophobia, niqab, Quran, Sarkozy, veil, women | 5 Comments
  1. Olivier D'hose says:
    April 29, 2010 at 10:05 pm

    Looks like Belgium has passed a law to that effect. See http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2010/04/29/les-deputes-belges-s-appretent-a-voter-l-interdiction-du-voile-integral_1344971_3214.html (in French) for some details.

    It is interesting that the law was voted today (April 29) considering that Belgium doesn’t have a government anymore…

  2. Msinfomaven says:
    April 30, 2010 at 4:32 am

    France is not the only country making laws against the niqab. Belgium, parts of Germany and parts of Canada are making laws against it too. Interestingly one of the main groups leading the Niqab ban in Canada is the Canadian Muslim Congress (Sunni Muslims). . . and it’s not just Western Countries . . .

    Al Azhar University in Cairo has banned women from wearing niqab to the famous University and many other Muslim countries such as Iraq heavily frown on this practice.

    Why?

    For policy makers this is not a question of a woman choosing to observe niqab, it has deeper religious and political motivations. Most countries, Western and Eastern, do not want the Saudi brand of Islam (Wahhabi or Salafi movements) to feel welcome or acceptable in their countries which is associated with the ultra-conservative practice of full-veiling. For them, this is not a matter of a “woman’s choice” but discouraging extremist Islamic groups who are hateful and disruptive in society to flourish.

    However, not ALL niqab wearing ladies are extremists. As a peace-loving Muslim woman who wears hijab I would be horrified if the hijab was banned. Where’s the balance between a woman’s right to choose, religious freedom and a countries right to protect itself from importing religious extremism? Personally I’m stuck on that one.

    Lesley, thank you for starting a blog site. I always enjoy your style and appreciate your perspective.

    Further reading, a discussion with Dr. Bernard Lewis:
    http://pewresearch.org/pubs/30/islam-and-the-west

    • Lesley Hazleton says:
      April 30, 2010 at 4:34 pm

      J’Amy, yes, the Belgian law just passed — even without a government. What got to me in today’s HuffPo piece on it was the citation of “Belgian anxieties that visible signs of Islam erode national identity.” I wonder what “a Belgian” looks like. A British writer’s stereotype like Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot? National stereotypes are insidious and absurd, all the more so when national legislatures themselves adopt them. And religious stereotypes are just as dangerous.

  3. Cathleen says:
    August 4, 2014 at 9:40 am

    I simply feel uncomfortable around those who try to hide in front of me and anyone would whatever reasons lie behind it. I simply feel that all this attempted to be intellectual debate is rather simple. It is not the covered women who talk to native wester ones that feel uncomfortable but the other side. They come to a foreign country and impose their own religious norms, and they do IMPOSE them as when it comes to speaking you just give an addressee an option of not listening but if you simply wear a cloth on your face, that restrain the hearing by the way, you impose it. Its like testing the boundaries of how tolerant the other side is, but what about your tolerance and respect of the western country. So expect to be respected but you don’t consider giving it back. Quite fair indeed…
    If you want to practice the weird way of being do it where everyone is like that but reflect twice before you make everyone like it too. Its just simple manners, sorry.

    • Lesley Hazleton says:
      August 25, 2014 at 10:26 am

      Thank you for your honesty. I gather your discomfort comes from the sense that “they” are hiding, though even with niqab, the eyes are visible, and the hijab covers only hair, not the face. The issue here seems to be that you feel something is being imposed on you. But what exactly?
      A few further questions occur to me:
      Do nuns wearing coifs also make you uncomfortable? Or orthodox Jewish women wearing wigs? Or African American women in big go-to-church hats? Is the discomfort only with women, or are you also uncomfortable with Sikhs wearing turbans?
      And when does a country stop being “foreign”? When you are born there? When you have lived there for half your life, as I have in the US? When you speak the language as well as or better than native-born citizens? When you are second-generation, or third-generation, or fourth or fifth or sixth or more?
      I hope you’ll agree with me that these are at least questions worth pondering. — L.

Order the Book

Available online from:
  • Amazon.com
  • Barnes & Noble
  • IndieBound
  • Powell's
Or from your favorite bookseller.

Tag Cloud

absurd agnosticism art atheism Christianity ecology existence feminism fundamentalism Islam Judaism light Middle East sanity technology TED TALKS ugliness US politics war women

Recent Posts

  • Flash! September 1, 2019
  • “What’s Wrong With Dying?” February 9, 2017
  • The Poem That Stopped Me Crying December 30, 2016
  • Talking About Soul at TED December 5, 2016
  • ‘Healing’? No Way. November 10, 2016
  • Psychopath, Defined August 2, 2016
  • Lovely NYT Review of ‘Agnostic’! July 14, 2016
  • Playing With Stillness June 22, 2016
  • Inside Palestine June 20, 2016
  • Virtual Unreality June 6, 2016
  • The Free-Speech Challenge May 23, 2016
  • Category-Free April 20, 2016
  • Staring At The Void April 13, 2016
  • Sherlock And Me April 3, 2016
  • Hard-Wired? Really? March 22, 2016
  • A Quantum Novel March 9, 2016
  • This Pre-Order Thing March 4, 2016
  • The Agnostic Celebration February 29, 2016
  • The First Two Pages February 23, 2016
  • Two Thumbs-Up For “Agnostic” February 10, 2016
Skip to toolbar
  • About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Support Forums
    • Feedback