Best Valentine of the Year

Hallmark card lovers, avert your eyes.

This piece by the transcendentally gifted Rebecca Brown is in the Valentine’s Day issue of The Stranger.  It’s called “Make Clean Our Heart Within Us,” and it makes me laugh and makes me want to cry and kind of blows me away.

Bleach it. Scrub it. Sandblast or power-wash it, hose it down. Dip it in lye.

Please, be my guest.

Nothing I have tried has worked: It’s crusty, brown, and scabbed. A lump. It has been bit into, chewed up, gnawed on, spat ou—no—wait—not “out.” It can’t get out. It’s stuck inside. Beneath “‘dem bones” and skin and other stuff.

Tear open the skin, dig in and grab and break ‘dem bones and yank. Do it by hand.

Or leave it in and nuke it. I don’t care. I gave up that malarkey long ago.

It’s weirdly shaped. Like an octopus with not enough arms and also twisted with osteoporosis. Or a plastic child’s toy such as a baby shoe, doll, or action figure melted in the sun in that top part of the back of the car, made slowly soft and droopy, and burning, hot—it hurts to touch—until after the sun has gone away and it cools to a hardened blob.

One often thinks of it as red, but maybe it’s not if the blood’s seeped out. Maybe it’s kind of pinkish, even white in some places, almost translucent, as pretty as a pearl, almost. Except for what it is.

Did it look worse when beating? Like a gelatinous clod of something from a grade B horror movie (such as the mushrooms then the people, in Matango: Attack of the Mushroom People [1963], directed by Ishiro Honda, who also did the Godzilla movies, in which, after a storm at sea, a boat washes up on a mysterious island. Shipwrecked together are a wealthy playboy, a professor-psychologist, a famous sexy female singer, an ingenue, a couple of others, and of course the skipper of the ship and his loyal sailor, just like on Gilligan’s Island which debuted on American television the following year. Who giveth unto whom? Who taketh what?), pulsating, throbbing, burbling, its slick or dull or smooth or shiny but certainly pokeable surface expanding and collapsing, expanding and collapsing like miner’s lung or heaving cow or great pink scarlet bubble of Bazooka Joe bubble gum some rowdy kid is just about to pop.

St. Catherine traded hers with God.

I remember seeing a picture of it. She’s standing on the ground and He is hovering in the air a bit above her. He’s on a tasteful little throw rug of a cloud. Her hand is up and out to him. Can I see something red in it? A thing to be got rid of? Or to keep? A thing of want. His hovering hand is open, too, and heading down toward her, but I can’t see if his hand is full or empty. Her hand is white and His is very, very white! As pure and clean and pure and cold as snow.

Has he just given His to her? Does she give hers to Him? Did one or the other do it first? Or did they do it simultaneously? Who opened whom? Each other or themselves? There must have been a lot of blood. What happened to the blood? What happens when the traded heart does not fit in the other’s waiting hole?

Whose great idea was this, anyway?

If it was His, was he just—uh—uh—ribbing her? Not ever thinking she would take Him up on it and—uh—uh—do it literally. But then when she said Yes, she wanted, Yes she would, Oh please, and started clawing at her chest, whatever else was He supposed to do?

Or did she simply stick her hand inside and pull? Like those amazing Filipino healers? They don’t use anesthetics! Tools! Or anything! They rearrange or take the bad things out of you, a secret done with just their hands, and with some poor pathetic miserable fuck who’s desperate with belief. They also only do it to someone else, not to themselves the way St. Catherine did. Though, of course, St. Catherine was not a Filipina, but Italian, from Sienna. I went there to her church one time and saw her mummified head. (It looked like a giant raisin.) The rest of her body is somewhere else. Rome, maybe? I don’t know where the heart is.

Or if there was a tool involved, what tools would they have had back then in Italy? A knife, a sword, a saw? A pair of tongs? Did someone else, not Him, give her a hand? (“Give her a hand…?” Hmmm… Don’t go there.) Was someone passing by who saw her clawing at herself and crying, crying, crying inconsolably because she couldn’t, she just could not do it, could not get it right, she could not break herself, so then did someone (angel? Or Samaritan?) appear to help and if so, was this then a miracle?

Or had she asked a friend to help?  Though of whom could one ask a thing like that?

What’s too unclean to be made clean must be removed alone. For superpower Him, this would be easy. But not for her. No, not for her. She had to work at it.  This took her long.  This took her years.  This took her life.

Pull the muscle and meat away like pulling the fat from the rib of a pig.  Now, yank it out.  Now give it to Him.  It may be good, what’s given back, but by the time it does you’re halfway dead.

My hands were never white like hers.  And the other’s more than mere unclean;  it’s fucking filthy.

To try would render filthier.

At least that’s my excuse.

If this whets your appetite, as it were, for more of Rebecca Brown, check out two of my favorite books of hers:   ‘American Romances‘ and for the very brave (you have been warned!)  ‘The Dogs‘.

“Do You See Religion on my Chest?”

Am running this because this woman is dynamite.  Am running it because I so admire her dignity and guts and warmth and honesty.  Am running it because after seeing this video, I am in love with her.

It’s a superb response to the whole miserable outing of the Susan G. Komen Foundation (the pink ribbons and pink teddy bears breast-cancer-cure people)  as patently anti-women.  Komen’s directors revealed the astonishing scope of their hypocrisy (and fraud) when they decided to defund Planned Parenthood’s breast-cancer screening — a decision made for clearly right-wing religious-political reasons.   Under the pressure of public disgust, they have since said they’ve reversed their decision — but for this year only.)

“Do you see religion on my chest?” Linda asks in  this video.  “Do you see politics on my chest?”   And she concludes with the perfect last line.

Hazleton on Hitchens

Last month, Town Hall Seattle ran a program called ‘Three Lives,’  originally touted as eulogies of three public figures — Christopher Hitchens, Kim Jong-Il, and Vaclav Havel — linked by the sole fact that they’d happened to die within four days of each other in December.  I was asked to speak about Hitchens.  “No way,” I said.  “Not unless you’re ready for an anti-eulogy.”

They were.

Here’s the video, in which I start at about the 4.45 time mark, running to 23.10.

But if you want to see a really great presentation, go back to the video and start at the 57.35 mark, where ACT Theatre artistic director Kurt Beattie and actors Bob Wright and Tom Carrato deliver a stunning tribute to Vaclav Havel, inspiring me to go out and buy a copy of ‘Disturbing the Peace’ the next day, when I also read this moving assessment by his long-time translator, Paul Wilson.  I’m only sorry Havel had to die for me to pay closer attention.  But then that’s kind of Wilson’s point.

The Holy Hand Grenade

Groundhog-like, the hermit emerges briefly to note a small victory for sanity this week, when the US military academy at West Point was forced to rescind an invitation to certified bigot and extremist William Boykin, a self-described ‘Kingdom Warrior,’ to address their national prayer breakfast.

In fact they didn’t actually un-ask him.  They gave him the option of saying he was canceling.  I believe the technical military term for this is Covering Your Ass.

That’s the good news, sort of.  The bad news is of course that he was even invited in the first place.

And the real point is this:  what the hell is the US military academy doing having a ‘national prayer breakfast’ in the first place?

To which a friend  commented by forwarding this video clip (as he notes, it even includes a reference to breakfast cereal):

Two Quotes for the New Year

Hey, it’s the hermit here.  With almost a full first draft of the new book.  I can conceive of the day three or four months from now when I’ll dare to call it a final draft and send it off to my editor, then cower in terror as I wait for her response.   And hide my terror my blogging regularly again.

I’ve been such a good kid.  I’ve resisted the blogging impulse more times than I can count, and I have the manuscript pages to show for it.  But hey again, it’s the New Year, and since two kind-of-irresistible quotes just came my way, it seems churlish not to pass them on.  The first is appealingly inscrutable:

“Joy is that kind of happiness that does not depend on what happens.”

Of course being me, I couldn’t leave well enough alone, and went and checked the source.  Turns out it’s from David Steindl-Rast, who’s a Benedictine monk deep into Buddhism, and part of the Lindisfarne movement.  Which means, I suspect, that his idea of joy is far more solemn than mine.  Regardless, I like the Sufi-like play of it, since the word ‘happiness’ comes from ‘hap’, meaning chance, so I will happily de-solemnize it.   Not least by giving you the second quote, which a friend emailed me this morning.  It’s from E.B.White.  Yes, he of The New Yorker:

“Every morning I awake torn between the desire to save the world and an inclination to savor it.  This makes it hard to plan the day.”

This is particularly well-timed for me since like a fool I agreed to speak about why we advocate for social justice at a Seattle University book-festival breakfast next month.   My “interlocutor” (“can’t we just banter instead of interlocuting?” I whined) is a Jesuit priest.  No comment on what kind of idiot agnostic agrees to take on a Jesuit at all, let alone for breakfast.  But at least I now have my opening sally.  Thank you, Mr White.

Hermit Sighting

Here’s video of The Stranger’s literary editor Paul Constant giving me a Stranger Genius statuette at the Moore Theater in downtown Seattle the other night:

and since I’m guessing it was recorded on a phone, here’s (I think) what I said:

“Okay, I’m going to be totally uncool, because that’s what happens when you invite a hermit to what looks like being the best party of the year.  That’s what writers are when they’re in the middle of a book, hermits, so I’ve been spending my days shut up at home, wrestling with this one like crazy.   I mean, I know it seems like I should have figured out how to write a book by now, but it still feels like I’ve never done it before.  So once again I’m sitting there, wondering why I do this weird, lonely, difficult thing called writing, full of doubt and hesitation, and then The Stranger turns up at my door with this gorgeously disgusting sheet cake, and a check, and the biggest gift of all, which is renewed faith in what I do.  Thank you.”

And wow, I was right:   The Stranger knows how to throw a party!

Because It’s Beautiful

Molten gold glass tracing fire on paper… other-worldly:

Accidental Genius

Being a hermit‘s a cakewalk when you open your door and get presented with something like this:

Seattle Stranger's Genius Award

Yup, I’m a certified genius, the certifier being The Stranger, Seattle’s famous (make that infamous) alternative weekly.  The cake is sweet notice that they’ve given me a 2011 Stranger Genius Award.   Which is way cooler than I have words for.

Now all I have to do is live up to it and produce, um, a work of genius.  I’m thinking the chocolate might help…

What Work Is

A big smile this morning rouses me from writing hermitry:  Philip Levine is the new U.S. poet laureate.

A big smile because Levine is a mensch, a real mensch.  His poems are “gritty, hard-nosed evocations of the lives of working people,” says NYT critic Charles McGrath, somehow missing the point that in Levine’s hands, grit becomes haunting, soulful music.  And totally missing the point that here is a poet who resonates with the millions of “working people” not working right now.

Why do I love Levine?  Here’s the beginning of one of his best-known poems, What Work Is:

We stand in the rain in a long line
waiting at Ford Highland Park. For work.
You know what work is — if you’re
old enough to read this you know what
work is, although you may not do it.
Forget you. This is about waiting,
shifting from one foot to another.
Feeling the light rain falling like mist
into your hair, blurring your vision
until you think you see your own brother
ahead of you, maybe ten places.
You rub your glasses with your fingers,
and of course it’s someone else’s brother,
narrower across the shoulders than
yours but with the same sad slouch, the grin
that does not hide the stubbornness,
the sad refusal to give in to
rain, to the hours wasted waiting,
to the knowledge that somewhere ahead
a man is waiting who will say, “No,
we’re not hiring today,” for any
reason he wants…

And here’s a video of him reading another poem, Belle Isle.

See what I mean?

Caution: Writer at Work

Sometimes, writing is just damn hard.  Okay, most of the time.  Like now, as I’m trying to pull together the vast mass of rough pages for the new book, a biography of Muhammad, into a readable whole.  The research has been great, and reading through what I’ve already written has been exciting.  But now it’s time for craft — time to shape and rewrite everything into a coherent narrative that makes sense to others, not just to me.  And that’s a whole different ball game.  I’ve been tussling with just the two opening chapters for the past two weeks, approaching them this way and that, ‘solving’ the problem at night only to come back and totally unsolve it all over again the next morning.   Just now I came across this video, and that kitten could as well be me, the two perfect green apples the two perfect chapters I know are there but can’t quite get my hands on:

All of which is by way of saying that I think I’m going to have to take a break from posting here on the AT for a while — a few months, probably — and really focus in on getting a full draft written.  Because though I know some people are capable of stunning amounts of multi-tasking, I also know I’m not one of those people.  I need to become what any writer mid-book really is:   the most boring person in the world, totally mono-focused, all but unaware of everything else that’s happening.

The problem is that writing this blog is a wonderful and (to me, at least) surprising exception to that opening statement that writing is hard.  I find blogging a delight, and somehow even when I write out of anger, it’s still fun.   And your responses and comments are part of the delight and the fun, as well as enormously encouraging.   It really does feel like an ongoing conversation, and one I will badly miss.  So not-blogging (unblogging?) is going to be hard.  Which of course means that if I can’t resist, I may still post something from time to time.  Just not with any regularity.  Not until I have a full readable draft of The First Muslim (yes, that’s still the title).

There’s an upside, though:  not only will the book get written sooner, but when I come back to regular blogging (like three times a week), it’ll be with a huge amount of pent-up energy and appetite for the fray.  So this is absolutely not a farewell — not least because I’ve only just begun to touch on all the things I wanted to explore when I began the AT fifteen months ago — but just a temporary au revoir.

So please, bear with me, and wish me luck and bon voyage.  I’ll send postcards from time to time, telling you where I’m at.  And I’ll be back!  — Lesley

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 242 other followers